I’ve had no refund requests from my coaching programmes.
Zero.
And sure, I COULD hold that number up as proof that every client got exactly what they wanted.
I COULD tell you it demonstrates the quality of the coaching.
The strength of the programmes.
Or the incredible results everybody achieved.
But I can’t honestly know that from the refund number alone.
Because people choose not to request refunds for all kinds of reasons.
Some are delighted with the work.
Some accept that they didn’t participate as fully as they could have.
Some move on quietly when something isn’t right.
And some people simply don’t like asking for their money back.
My point?
What the number proves
A zero-refund rate tells me that nobody requested a refund.
That’s ALL it tells me with certainty.
If I want to understand whether a programme is ACTUALLY working, I need to look deeper.
Are people completing it?
Are they using the coaching?
Are they making meaningful changes?
Would they recommend the experience?
Do they want to continue?
And did the programme deliver the work it explicitly promised to deliver?
The thing is, numbers become dangerous when we ask them to prove more than they’re capable of proving.
A statistic might make your marketing sound more impressive.
But if you need to exaggerate what the number means, you haven’t strengthened the evidence.
You’ve weakened your relationship with the truth.
Truth, joy and love
Dax